
Originally Posted by
Gollywobbler
Hi Camilla
Everything you have said above is a 100% accurate description of the current Policy and Legislation. I am NOT trying to criticise you. Rather, I want to question you, please!
I am aware that the present Govt is having a blitz on trying to encourage new immigrants but to try to encourage them to go to the Regions rather than to the non-regional areas. I can understand why they are slanting the immigration programme in this way and I think that 16,000 is a sensible figure to aim for.
When the current lot were the Loyal Opposition, they produced a Paper in which they theorised that there was no reason why the population of Australia should not be allowed to rise to 50 million souls. According to the Paper - which had the official Government logo on it and had been presented to Parliament in some way - a new generation of immigrants could go and build new towns in places that are currently either underpopulated or not populated. These new towns would create mini-economies of their own and so forth. I read it and believed every word - it seemed very clever and truly visionary to me.
Then I asked an Australian doctor whom I know. He said, "Rubbish." I asked why he was so dismissive? He said, "There isn't enough fresh water in Australia to support a population of 50 million so this grandiose idea is dead before it even begins!" I reminded him about CY Conner and the freshwater pipeline that goes 600kms inland from Perth - to Kalgoorlie, I think. They've done it before, so why shouldn't they do it again, using desalinated sea water if necessary? He huffed that in this current age, CY Conner would be locked up in an institution for the criminally insane, in his opinion! He said that it would be murderously irresponsible to rely on anything except a reliable, natural, local source of sufficient fresh water and that was that! He said that in some parts of Australia, one could sink a borehole 3 miles deep without discovering fresh water.
Well - if he's right then 16,000 new recruits to the Regions each year does make much more sense than the original idea proposed in the Paper.
Have you heard any feedback about whether this new scheme is a success?
Also, have you heard anything about whether they are likely to maintain it at around 16,000 during 2012/2013?
Cheers
Gill
Bookmarks